The Future of Product Data Maintenance in the Fund Industry
- dmoore2945
- 2 days ago
- 7 min read
By Christoph Napetschnig, Head of Data, FundSense
In today’s fund industry, product data has moved from the back office to the centre of the business. It is no longer just an operational necessity. It is the foundation of trust, compliance, and growth.
Every fund, share class, or investment vehicle carries a dense web of attributes, including:
core identifiers such as fund name, ISIN and domicile;
investment features such as objectives, benchmarks and risk classifications;
fees and charges;
lifecycle events;
regulatory disclosures;
ESG characteristics and sustainability indicators.
This data powers fund documentation, regulatory submissions, distributor feeds, investor portals and analytics platforms. When it is accurate and aligned, the organisation moves with confidence. When it is fragmented or inconsistent, the entire value chain feels the impact.
For many firms, however, product data is still scattered across spreadsheets, legacy systems and email threads.
A single fee change, benchmark switch or new share-class launch can trigger a flurry of manual updates in multiple systems and templates. Delays creep in. Inconsistencies appear. Distributors raise queries. Compliance teams worry about outdated KIIDs, PRIIPs documents or SFDR annexes. What once looked like a data hygiene issue is now a major constraint on operational agility and regulatory readiness.
At FundSense, we believe the next phase of efficiency and innovation in asset management will be powered by intelligent product data maintenance – a shift from manual upkeep to automated, governed and data-driven ecosystems.
Why Product Data Maintenance Matters More Than Ever
Product data sits at the centre of everything an asset manager does:
Informing fund prospectuses, factsheets and KI(I)Ds
Driving PRIIPs and SFDR disclosures
Populating EMT and EET files for distributors
Feeding data vendors and digital platforms
Shaping what investors see when they research a fund online
Yet in many organisations, this critical data still lives in disconnected silos. Operations teams maintain one view, product management another, marketing a third, and ESG teams a fourth. When attributes change – a fee reduction, a benchmark update, a new SFDR classification – the update must ripple across all these environments. Too often, it does not.
The consequences are increasingly material:
Longer time-to-market for new funds and share classes
Increased regulatory risk from lagging or inconsistent disclosures
Loss of trust from distributors and platforms
Significant internal effort spent reconciling conflicting data
Maintaining product data is no longer an administrative task. It has become a strategic capability that underpins operational resilience and commercial credibility.
The Current Challenges
Behind the scenes, a familiar pattern plays out across the industry.
Product data is fragmented, stored in multiple systems that rarely agree in full. A fund might be defined one way in the accounting platform, another in the document engine, and a third in the CRM or distribution database. Spreadsheets sit in shared drives, quietly acting as de facto masters for particular markets or channels. Each team updates their own version, often with good intentions, but with no guarantee of consistency.
Manual workflows dominate. A change in fee or benchmark is circulated via email, added to a spreadsheet, passed to different teams for entry into their respective systems, and eventually reflected (one hopes) in documents and feeds. Every manual touchpoint introduces the possibility of error. Every hand-off adds latency. When something is missed, teams scramble to correct downstream outputs, often under time pressure.
Ownership can be unclear. Product data touches product management, operations, compliance, legal, risk, marketing, ESG and IT. Without clearly defined stewardship and governance, it is easy for responsibility to become diffuse. Changes get stuck. Questions arise about which value is “right”. Historical lineage is hard to reconstruct when regulators or internal audit ask what was in force at a particular time.
Regulatory and disclosure burdens continue to grow. PRIIPs, SFDR, SDR and other regimes expect high-quality, timely and consistent data. Distributors and data vendors demand standardised templates and feeds. A single incorrect field in a PRIIPs KID, a misaligned ESG indicator in an SFDR annex or an outdated value in an EMT can have consequences that reach far beyond operations.
Distribution complexity magnifies the challenge. Firms operating across multiple jurisdictions juggle different languages, regulatory frameworks and platform requirements. Each market may require its own nuances. Each vendor its own template. Product data maintenance must simultaneously support localisation, multiple channels and ongoing change.
The result is a constant maintenance burden. Product data is never “set and forget”; it evolves as funds launch, merge, close, change benchmark, adjust fees or add new share classes.
Without the right foundations, keeping everything in sync becomes a permanent uphill struggle.
From Maintenance to Intelligence: The Emerging Future
The good news is that a different model is emerging. Across the industry, forward-looking firms are moving from reactive maintenance to intelligent, integrated product data ecosystems built on centralisation, automation, governance, ESG integration and interoperability.
A key development is the rise of Product Master Data frameworks. Instead of treating product attributes as scattered fields in different systems, firms are defining a single, governed source of truth for every fund and share class. This “product master” holds the full, validated record from core identifiers and investment features to fees, lifecycle events and regulatory attributes.
At FundSense, we’ve seen firms dramatically reduce operational effort by centralising product data into a unified ‘golden source’.
When all downstream systems and documents draw from this golden source, duplication decreases and trust improves. The organisation knows where to look when it needs the definitive answer.
On top of this centralised foundation, automation and workflow intelligence are transforming how updates move through the organisation. Manual rekeying and email-based approvals are giving way to rule-driven workflows that validate changes, route them for review, and propagate them automatically to downstream channels. Machine-assisted checks can spot anomalies, missing fields or inconsistent values before they reach investors or distributors.
Platforms like FundSense have shown that intelligent automation can dramatically reduce manual effort, freeing teams to focus on higher-value activities.”
Governance and auditability strengthen in parallel. Regulators increasingly expect firms to know not only what their data says, but where it came from, who changed it and when. Modern product data platforms embed lineage, versioning and full audit trails into their design. Every change is captured. Every approval is recorded. Governance becomes something the system enforces, rather than an afterthought maintained in separate documents.
ESG and sustainability data add another dimension. Sustainability scores, taxonomy alignment, PAI indicators, labels and emissions metrics are now part of the product’s identity, not side-car disclosures. They must be maintained with the same rigour as fees or benchmarks, and they often span multiple providers and regulatory regimes.
FundSense’s ESG automation modules help firms ingest, validate, and distribute sustainability data seamlessly. It’s what the industry will need as ESG rules evolve globally.
Finally, interoperability is becoming essential. Product data does not live within a single organisation. It sits at the centre of an ecosystem that includes distributors, data vendors, platforms, advisers and investors. The future lies in API-driven connectivity, standardised data models and digital pipelines that allow approved updates to flow instantly across this network. In that world, everyone works from the same, current information and discrepancies are the exception, not the rule.
A Vision of the Future
If these trends continue, product data maintenance will look very different from the manual, fragmented processes many firms rely on today.
Imagine a world in which a benchmark change is approved once in the product master and, almost immediately, every connected system, document template and external feed reflects the new value. Data errors are detected automatically and flagged before they appear on a factsheet or platform. Product managers can launch a new fund without waiting weeks for every system to be configured manually. ESG and regulatory templates are generated directly from trusted, validated product data rather than pieced together under deadline pressure.
This is not a distant vision. It is already becoming reality for firms that invest in the right architecture and governance. At FundSense, we’re proud to help firms move toward this vision; enabling product data to be accurate, automated, and actionable across its entire lifecycle.
How Firms Can Prepare
Moving towards this future does not require transforming everything at once. It starts with a clear understanding of where you are today and a deliberate plan for where you want to go.
The first step is to clarify ownership and governance. That means defining who is responsible for the product record, how changes are requested and approved, and how disputes about “the right value” are resolved. Data stewardship roles, escalation paths and sign-off rules create the foundations for trust.
From there, firms can begin building a central product data hub. This might initially consolidate the most critical attributes (such as objectives, benchmarks, fees, risk classifications, and key regulatory fields) before expanding into ESG and distribution tags. The aim is to move progressively towards of truth that all systems and documents can rely on.
Automation naturally follows. Once the hub exists, manual spreadsheets and email chains can give way to structured workflows. Approvals can be captured in the system. Updates can trigger controlled propagation to documents, regulatory templates and external feeds. Over time, more of the routine work shifts from people to processes, freeing teams to focus on oversight and improvement.
Data quality must be monitored, not assumed. Firms can define metrics for completeness, accuracy and timeliness, and use dashboards to track these over time. Patterns in distributor queries, feed rejections or internal exceptions can highlight where processes need refinement.
Crucially, ESG and regulatory data should be integrated into the core product record rather than treated as separate projects. Treating sustainability and disclosure attributes as first-class citizens in the product master ensures they benefit from the same governance, automation and interoperability as the rest of the dataset.
Finally, technology choices matter. Cloud-native, API-driven architectures give firms the flexibility to evolve, connect with new partners, and support near real-time updates. Platforms built specifically for the fund industry can embed industry templates, regulatory nuances and lifecycle complexity in ways that generic tools often cannot.
Conclusion: Data Maintenance as a Strategic Enabler
The fund industry’s complexity is only increasing. New regulations, products, channels and investor expectations make accurate data management harder and more important than ever. Firms that master product data maintenance will unlock real strategic advantages: faster product launches, cleaner data ecosystems, reduced risk, and better experiences for distributors and investors alike.
For firms that do not, the consequences tend to emerge gradually rather than dramatically. Product launches slow as changes take longer to coordinate and validate. Remediation costs rise as inconsistencies are corrected downstream under time pressure. Over time, distributors and platforms lose confidence in the reliability of data, creating a quiet but persistent drag on reputation and distribution effectiveness.
At FundSense, we see product data maintenance not as a back-office chore, but as a core capability for the next generation of asset management - one that connects people, processes and technology into a single, coherent whole.
The future of product data maintenance is not about simply keeping up with change. It is about sustaining control, trust, and momentum as complexity grows - intelligently, efficiently, and confidently.
We invite you to connect with us to continue this conversation. Let's explore how FundSense can help you face The Future of Product Data Maintenance.
Comments